Introduction
The word stems from the Latin word adiuvare, meaning to help or aid.
In the context of medicine they are supposed to help increase the efficacy or potency of certain drugs according to Wikipedia.
There are three main strands:
– Adjuvant therapy in cancer management
– Analgesic adjuvant in pain management
– Immunologic adjuvant in vaccines
I will concentrate on the last, that for vaccines. Here is the Wikipedia link.
It expands on the nature of such a substance.
“An immunologic adjuvant is defined as any substance that acts to accelerate, prolong, or enhance antigen-specific immune responses when used in combination with specific vaccine antigens.”
So essentially it is to promote an immune response. And that is defined thus:
An immune response is a physiological reaction which occurs within an organism in the context of inflammation for the purpose of defending against exogenous factors.
These include a wide variety of different toxins, viruses, intra- and extracellular bacteria, protozoa, helminths, and fungi which could cause serious problems to the health of the host organism if not cleared from the body.
From
In plain English this means that the body has something toxic/a foreign body injected into it and it objects. It does whatever it can to remove the offending matter.
Or more simply, the body says ‘I don’t need this crap!’
I say that the phrase ‘immune response’ is big pharma’s deceitful way to cover up the truth that a poisoning event occurs. What else would you expect if you have such stuff injected into you?
As I might expect we also find the truth in anagrams of the phrase ‘immune response’. For example:
– Impureness omen
– Seen up misnomer
– Mo spurn enemies
As regards the Immunologic adjuvant link earlier it expands on the theme of increasing an immune response (poisoning event reaction).
Adjuvants in immunology are often used to modify or augment the effects of a vaccine by stimulating the immune system to respond to the vaccine more vigorously, and thus providing increased immunity to a particular disease.
Note the assumption at the end with no justification. How do they know it provides increased immunity to a particular disease? It is a statement based on pure fantasy.
They would no doubt argue that the statistics show that the particular disease has been reduced.
But then who trusts statistics, let alone the medical industrial complex which manipulates them to its advantage?
It should be obvious if you have toxic substances/foreign bodies injected into you all that will happen is a defensive reaction.
Types of adjuvants
Various types of adjuvants are listed in the link.
– Inorganic compounds:
potassium alum – this is a weak irritant to the skin. It will obviously irritate you internally. It is used to help stop bleeding from minor cuts. So it tends to bung things up. Not a good idea internally.
aluminium hydroxide – there is no known benefit for aluminium in the body. The Wikipedia entry says
Since then, multiple epidemiological studies have found no connection between exposure to environmental or swallowed aluminium and neurological disorders, though injected aluminium was not looked at in these studies.
From
Injected aluminium was not looked at in these studies eh?
So nobody has bothered to check whether injected aluminium affects people. And this goes back to the 1960’s and 70’s. And still they use it?!
aluminium phosphate – the Wikipedia link says
Aluminium adjuvant use is widespread due to its cheap price, long history of use, safety and efficiency with most antigens.
But they haven’t check about injected aluminium have they, so they can’t say it is safe. But it is cheap, wonderful for the bottom line of big pharma profits.
calcium phosphate hydroxide – this has a link to Hydroxyapatite which is presumably its common name.
The link says it is used externally but with no reference to vaccines. It says it has been cleared of risks in external use subject to limited concentrations. But
…it warns of needle-shaped nano hydroxyapatite and of inhalation in spray products.
Needle-shaped nano hydroxyapatite in the blood stream though? Needles through the skin injecting more needles within the body. Ouch!
– Oils:
paraffin oil – petroleum based. Fuels a lamp and is used for constipation. It will obviously cause an internal response if injected. Would you normally try injecting it into yourself?
propolis (only in preclinical studies).
Adjuvant 65 (based on peanut oil) was tested in influenza vaccines in the 1970s, but was never released commercially.
The oil squalene is used in the adjuvant MF59 – I gather
The WHO goes further to explain that squalene has been present in over 22 million flu vaccines given to patients in Europe since 1997 without significant vaccine-related adverse events.
From
“without significant vaccine-related adverse events.” So just some minor adverse events.
Any significant benefits though? Poisoning people gives benefits? Do they think we are that stupid?
Yes, some people are easily deceived.
– Bacterial products:
killed bacteria of the species Bordetella pertussis, Mycobacterium bovis, toxoids. MPL (Monophosphorylated lipid A) is a modified form of a bacterial lipid A protein that is used in several vaccines.
In essence you will be having dead stuff injected into you. That is, waste products. Hardly surprisingly your body will react.
I won’t comment on the others which you can look up if you wish.
Summary and final thoughts
Adjuvants are included in vaccines to stimulate an immune response. The immune response is the natural response of your body to an enemy invasion, a poisoning event.
How badly you react will depend on your state of health, chemical balance body weight etc.
Your body is designed to withstand the assaults of enemies, but like any stronghold has to be maintained, well fed and watered and the outer defences cared for.
Having the outer defences, the skin, breached and the enemy injected inside is like the Trojan Horse at Troy. It contains hidden dangers which can strike at your vital organs.
So it is not a good idea to invite them in by being vaccinated.
Your immune response is an ‘omen impureness’, a warning of something impure, poisonous in your body needing removal.
There is no justification for having impure stuff injected into you; it is a gross deceit to say your body learns from this.
However, if you are ill or harmed then hopefully your mind will say ‘Aha, I had better not do that again.’ If you are dead it will be too late of course to learn anything.
Call ‘adjuvants’ and ‘immune response’ what they are, toxic chemicals/waste and a poisoning event reaction.
Finally it may be noted that out of 1,127 possible anagrams of ‘adjuvants’ there is this one.
DJ Satan UV
I don’t know about you but I don’t want Satan injected into me!
P.S. My main link on vaccines which contains my Covid 19 Summary link. This in turn contains various sublinks on the various aspects.
What is the ‘flu a.k.a Covid 19 and why vaccines are pointless at best.
P.P.S . I am trying to complete a post on the Assisted Dying Bill which they are trying to bring in via the House of Lords today where it will have had its first reading.
I am also trying to complete something on Kamala Harris before the election day in the US.
Well stated. Dr.'s that refuse to question safety & efficacy of vaccines are a disgrace, an embarrassment to their profession. Financial incentives to poison people's bodies & minds is criminal.
To this day our "top scientists" in the field of immunology still admit that the mechanisms at work with adjuvants are "poorly understood." All they've really figured out, is that injecting toxins "triggers" the immune system. They have never once even attempted to study the long-term effects of continually injecting the human body with toxins that trigger the immune system.
Literally any substance that triggers the immune system upon injection is considered a GOOD thing to inject in the world of vaccinology. However, within the field of toxicology.......
Which brings me to my next issue, which is that the very idea of any scientifically sound TOXICOLOGICAL study methods are ferociously BANNED from any vaccine "safety" studies. The vaccine freaks have slandered the true scientific method (wherein you maintain true controls for comparison of outcomes) calling real science "unethical." They claim it's unethical to NOT inject a human with SOMETHING, anything, at all times.