I’m pussed off – UK government wants cats microchipped
By Baldmichael Theresoluteprotector’sson
I had not heard about this. It was under my radar as they say until I saw a substack page on it. The corrupted UK government drafted legislation saying that all cats must be microchipped.
This is extending an existing law re dogs.
The legislation was signed into law on the 25th April 2023 by Richard Benyon, once an MP, now in the House of Lords.
This is the link to that final legislation.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2023/468/contents/made
However it seems it was Thérèse Coffey who introduced the draft.
The raison d’être, as the French say, for the law is in essence to help reunite thousands of lost or stray pets every year.
The actual reason is of course to make money for those who will insert the chips (veterinary surgeons) and justify employing people to go round penalising people for non-compliance.
The fine for non-compliance is up to £500.
The likely cost of microchipping
In the UK, you can expect to pay anywhere between £20 and £30, depending on where you live.
from
https://www.cats.org.uk/help-and-advice/neutering-and-vaccinations/microchipping-your-cat
So put the fear of God into people with a potentially large fine relative to a relatively small one.
If you are poor on a pension then relatively small become highly significant.
The draft says
It will not be compulsory for free living cats that live with little or no human interaction or dependency, such as farm, feral or community cats.
So if you own a cat tell it if it doesn’t want to be microchipped, it had better pretend to be a community cat and do the rounds of the neighbours.
My parents had cats and I grew up with them. There was a cat my mother called ‘Six dinner Sid’ as she reckoned he visited 5 other houses before coming to ours.
Anyway, the government is trying to force all cat owners to pay for something they don’t actually need.
Consulation
There was believe it or not an eight week consultation. However, as I said it was under my radar for the simple reason the government slipped it out just before Christmas 2020 on the 23rd December.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cat-microchipping-consultation-launched
You may recall this was when a Christmas lockdown was ‘ruled’ and most people believed the lies and had a rather miserable festivity as a consequence.
Micro chipping cats’ consultations would hardly be on people’s list of priorities, and I am not aware it was widely known there even was a consultation.
This was the result of the consultation.
The headline figures included this top one.
99% (33,129) of respondents supported compulsory cat microchipping in England
So that’s 33,129 mini Hitlers then. I wonder how many supported lockdowns and mandatory vaccines etc.
According to this site
https://www.cats.org.uk/about-cp/cats-report
Cat population and ownership
There are around 11 million owned cats in the UK, the same number as in 2022
Just over one in four households (26%) own a cat
The percentage of pedigree cats obtained has increased over time: 42% of cats obtained in the last 12 months were pedigree or purebred compared with 17% more than five years ago
The average number of cats per household is 1.5 cats, with 67% of cat-owning households having one cat, and 33% owning two or more cats
Therefore I make this about 7,333,333 households with one or more cats.
So assuming this being correct, about 0.45% of total households responded to the survey. The website says
An estimated 8 million cats are microchipped (73%)
On that basis I make it about 1,833,333 possible households who might have objected, let alone any others like myself.
So I just wonder how many would have objected to compulsory microchipping if they had known about the consultation.
My wife and I don’t have a cat, although we were adopted by a neighbour’s cat which sadly died before 2020. Nevertheless I would have strongly objected if I had known.
It is one thing to offer it, quite another to make it mandatory. We know where that sort of thing leads.
Mark of the beast?
This article talks about the possible implications of such technology.
What your pet’s microchip has to do with the Mark of the Beast April 3, 2019
https://theconversation.com/what-your-pets-microchip-has-to-do-with-the-mark-of-the-beast-114493
The article talks about Radio Frequency Identification chips (RFID chips) and concerns among evangelical Christians about the insertion of these into a human. They consider them as being the Mark of the Beast, of the antichrist.
From the Book of Revelation
“[The beast] causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”
Now we can get this anagram from ‘Radio Frequency Identification chips’.
If qui Reich Satanic encryption codified
A contrivance of course, yet very relevant. The word ’qui’ might seem out of place but as it means ‘who’ in French it is interesting.
After all there is the WHO!
Here are two more anagrams.
fyi queer deific hp contraindications
in acquiescence idiopathy Ron Triffid
N.B. idiopathy is a description of an unknown cause of a disease, whilst Triffid is a plant creature from John Wyndham’s ‘Day of the Triffids’.
Here is a short video (4min 26s) with someone’s opinion.
All cats must be microchipped (precursor to Mark of the Beast)
You may have heard about microchips and drugs.
Microchips in Medicine: Current and Future Applications 2016 Jun 7.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4914739
It says
4. Future Applications
The widespread application of microchip technology has the potential to be transformative to the modern healthcare system. Therapeutic processes will be changed, billions of dollars worth of unnecessary expenses will be avoided, and the quality of life of patient populations will increase.
Given that the whole of big pharma is corrupted this is a deceitful blind alley.
In any event, do you see big pharma wanting to lose out on billions of dollars’ worth of unnecessary expenses?
Microchipping adverse effects
It a legal requirement to report adverse reactions/events relating to microchips and microchip failure in dogs.
from
It lists these issues.
Implantation reactions
On rare occasions, an animal may react to an implanted microchip, as with any foreign material introduced into the body, with an inflammatory response.
There are a very small number of reports of paralysis.
Microchip Migration
Fairly obviously this can occur; the defence system of the body is designed to remove such things if it can.
Microchip Failure
Again obviously this might occur for various reasons.
This site mentions side effects too.
https://peeva.co/blog/side-effects-of-microchipping-a-dog
It says
The procedure is similar to your dog getting a routine vaccination.
Which is hardly a ringing endorsement. A microchip is not a toxic vaccine but it is nevertheless a foreign body to the animal as indicated above.
And who knows what could be in a microchip, including the possibility of triggering harm or death.
Miscellaneous
Going back to the link at the start of the article.
Treasured pets now safer as microchipping for cats becomes compulsory
The title of the press release says it all, a psychological manipulation to play on the weaknesses of people. Pets are allegedly safer. What nonsense.
Environment Secretary Thérèse Coffey said:
“Cats and kittens are treasured members of the family, and it can be devasting for owners when they are lost or stolen.
“Legislating for compulsory microchipping of cats will give comfort to families by increasing the likelihood that lost or stray pets can be reunited with their owners.”
Notice it is “increasing the likelihood”, there can be no certainty of course.
Thérèse Coffey is no longer in government due to the stress and as her Wikipedia entry indicates she “nearly died”.
I am not going to analyse her in detail but I consider her to have been wholly unsuitable for government and frankly one wonders about her being an MP.
I see her full name, Thérèse Anne Coffey will anagram to
– Enter she any coffee
So useful in a meeting if you need a drink.
Chief Veterinary Officer Christine Middlemiss said:
“I am pleased that we are progressing with our requirement for all cats to be microchipped.
“Microchipping is by far the most effective and quickest way of identifying lost pets. As we’ve seen with dog microchipping, those who are microchipped are more than twice as likely to be reunited with their owner.
This is her.
https://www.gov.uk/government/people/christine-middlemiss
Her Wikipedia entry is limited. She has a family farming background in the Scottish Borders. It says she has a cat, and I assume she is not married or with a partner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Middlemiss
It says
She is responsible for the UK badger cull which has seen half of the badger population slaughtered as part of controversial bovine tuberculosis measures and is the leading defender of the policy
There is a footnote link as below.
Rebuttal of claims on TB cull effectiveness 18 March 2022
https://deframedia.blog.gov.uk/2022/03/18/rebuttal-of-claims-on-tb-cull-effectiveness
It says
There has been widespread, misleading media coverage about the impact of badger culling on lowering Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) disease levels in high risk areas of England.
and
We are transitioning away from intensive culling to focus on badger vaccination, improved on-farm testing and cattle vaccination when available.
Badger vaccination eh? Cattle vaccination eh? How come I am not encouraged by this?!
Still, The Guardian has come to the rescue.
Badger culls are not best way to cut bovine TB, report finds
This article is more than 1 month old
Exclusive: Badger Trust analysis comes 10 years after government started culls in England against scientific advice
4 Jan 2024
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/04/badger-culls-bovine-tb-report
It says
Improved cattle testing, better financial and mental health support for farmers, and cattle and badger vaccination will more effectively tackle bovine TB in cattle than culling badgers, according to a report.
The review of evidence by the Badger Trust comes after 10 years of culling in England killed 210,237 badgers, costing £58.8m, without a significant easing of cattle TB.
The disease costs taxpayers more than £100m each year, with 20,000 cows prematurely slaughtered.
The evilness of vaccination notwithstanding, this is evidence if you needed it of government incompetence at best, corruption at worst.
Consider this alongside Foot and Mouth Disease, another evil scam which that nasty little man Neil Ferguson had a hand in, distorting the reality with his ‘models’.
Huge amounts of money wasted, farmers’ lives turned upside down. And I haven’t even considered the issue of bovine TB itself and what is really occurring with this disease.
So Christine Middlemiss is an arrogant woman. She reminds me of the Nazis. This is indicated by the fact that
– Ms Hitler chin line misdeeds
– Hi I Himmler SS descendent li
– Did Himmler steeliness inch
– Me Ms Hitler hidden lice sins
Are all anagrams of her full name, Christine Helen Middlemiss.
Given what she has done I think Christine Muddlemess would be a more appropriate name for her. In fact
– diminished cretin hell mess
is another anagram, so close enough.
Madison Rogers said
“Cats Protection is delighted that pet cats in England will be given the same protection as dogs when it comes to microchipping. The charity regularly reunites owners with their much-loved cats, and in most cases this is only possible thanks to microchips. No matter how far from home they are found, or how long they have been missing, if a cat has a microchip there is a good chance that a lost cat will be swiftly returned home.”
Protection?? Who is she kidding? This is not about protection but control and money generation.
A brief CV is to be found here.
https://www.cats.org.uk/mediacentre/spokespeople
Madison has a degree in politics and international relations and formerly worked for a public affairs agency in London with clients in financial services and the rail industry. Madison is currently an Executive Committee member for the Women in Public Affairs Network, representing women in the industry who work for charities. She has a rescue cat called Moodles.
So she is just a PR wallah, or should that be wally. Anyway she seems to have been partly responsible for this Nazi piece of legislation.
I see these anagrams of her name,
– Air demon gross
– So Mad ego rr sin
– Soros dreaming
Or perhaps it is simply she is ‘I Rogers mad son’. Whatever, she is a mad woman.
Summary and final thoughts
I understand Benjamin Franklin once said: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
This legislation came in under the guise of protection and recovering stolen or lost cats. I consider this was appealing to the anxieties of the female mind rather than the male who in general is more pragmatic about this sort of thing.
It was presented by three females in the press release. If this is what the feminists think is achieving equality with men then they seem to have scrapped the barrel with their choices.
If they thought men that incompetent to judge this sort of thing it would have been better to have left the men to make a hash of things rather than have women make fools of themselves.
Except it is worse than foolish and unnecessary, and not merely giving an excuse for someone to make more money at others expense by coercing them to do something under threat of a large fine.
And this came in under a Conservative government! They sneaked it in via the back door as it were, taking advantage of the lockdown folly.
This reeks of totalitarianism, the Nazis and Communists, no wonder the Tories did so badly in council elections last year.
This is a despicable law and should be promptly repealed lest it lead to more abuses.
We had enough of those with the COVID 19 nonsense and we don’t need any more.
P.S. here are some links for those who haven’t seem
Neil Ferguson: how did his Covid 19 statistics fool the world?
Just one more step to getting the public comfortable with the whole microchipping idea. The goal is to microchip us all. They’ll sell that one with, “look, when you go to market, you won’t have to pull out a card, we can just scan you!” Remember the video of the twenty-something girl using an embedded chip to scan her groceries? She was thrilled “at the convenience”!
It is coming down to the time where people are going to have to refuse to comply or be enslaved by this system that is now bearing down like a freight train. It's either civil disobedience or just give in and do everything THEY say. People have to decide now where to draw that line. This is past that line for me. I would never comply because the next time it will only be something worse and more invasive. Do not comply and do not pay the "fine" either.